Arquivo de Publications - Page 27 of 36 - CEsA
A teoria da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento e o estado da arte da cooperação portuguesa

Working Paper 80/2009: A teoria da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento e o estado da arte da cooperação portuguesa


Abstract:

A teoria da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento e o estado da arte da cooperação portuguesa aims to contribute to an evolution of the discipline’s autonomy, by proposing a reading of the activity and the actors of the International Cooperation for Development – CID in Portugal. The emergence of a research practice that the creation in 2004 of the African Studies area at the Foundation for Science and Technology – FCT facilitates, the scheduling and editing facilities that the Institute for Portuguese Cooperation – ICP and current Instituto Português de Apoio to Development – IPAD provides its employees to attend master’s degrees in the area and publish their theses in their own collection, the institutionalization of research and teaching that we see in the emergence of master’s degrees, postgraduate courses, modules and disciplines on CID in different Universities, Higher Education Schools and Polytechnic Institutes, as recently at the University of Minho, or the incentive for doctorates that provides the creation of a specific program in the recent Autonomous Section of African Studies at ISCTE, inserted in the area of ​​Sociology, or the recent doctoral program in the area of ​​development at ISEG, makes us believe that Portugal is developing a process of improving knowledge about CID, which, despite appearing years after what is already being done in countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, France, Sweden or the Netherlands, has the advantage of being able to learn from what “ international cooperation community” has done and continues to do.

 

Quotation:

Sangreman, Carlos. 2009. “A teoria da cooperação internacional para o desenvolvimento e o estado da arte da cooperação portuguesa”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão – CEsA Documentos de Trabalho nº 80/2009.

O novo paradigma europeu para a cooperação para o desenvolvimento

Working Paper 79/2009: O novo paradigma europeu para a cooperação para o desenvolvimento


Abstract:

The European Union (understood as the set composed of the European Commission and the Member States) is the world’s largest provider of official development assistance (ODA), the main trading partner of developing countries and a crucial actor in international political dialogue. Development cooperation policy represents the main pillar of relations between the European Union (EU) and all developing countries. In November 2005, the approval of the “European Consensus on Development” by the Council of Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting in the Council of the European Union, by the European Commission and by the European Parliament, defined a new institutional framework guiding the entire EU action in the area of ​​cooperation with developing countries. Among the main instruments for implementing this vision is the ODA granted by European States and government agencies. The document adopted in 2005 replaced the first EU Development Declaration of 2005, in order to respond to new international events such as September 11 and security concerns, and to reflect the global partnership around the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). O novo paradigma europeu para a cooperação para o desenvolvimento precisely analyzes the implementation of this type of ODA in light of the commitments made in the declaration.

 

Quotation:

Mah, Luís. 2009. “O novo paradigma europeu para a cooperação para o desenvolvimento”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 79/2009.

Uma proposta de Observatório da Cooperação portuguesa

Working Paper 78/2009: Uma proposta de Observatório da Cooperação portuguesa


Abstract:

In Uma proposta de Observatório da Cooperação portuguesa we study the discussion on the impacts of development aid that has evolved in the sense of recognizing the complexity of elements that condition the evolution of well-being and economic growth indicators in developing countries. In this way, the search for explanations for the persistence or even worsening of poor living conditions in the developing countries and the scarcity of ODA results has paved the way for reflection on the functioning of international institutions and aid, noting, for example, the need to strengthen their accountability, transparency and participation mechanisms (Wenar, 2006: 1). However, the recognition, within the international community of donors, that the management and governance models of international aid are not adequate to the international objectives of reducing poverty in the developing countries, often contributing to exacerbate the weaknesses of their public administration systems , being at the same time not very transparent and scrutiny, is relatively recent, from the late 90s of the 20th century. It is in 2005, with the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, that a commitment is reached between OECD DAC countries and partner countries to reform the way in which development aid is provided and managed. In this sense, principles of action for donors and recipients were defined in order to a) support the strengthening of capacities in developing countries to define their priorities and poverty reduction strategies, improving their institutions and fighting corruption; b) align development aid with the objectives defined by the developing countries and with the local systems of administration; c) harmonizing the actions of donor countries, avoiding duplication of efforts and simplifying administrative and bureaucratic procedures, in order to make the implementation of aid on the ground more effective and efficient; d) focus aid on the results to be achieved (and on their measurement); e) to hold both donors and partners accountable for the results achieved by development aid (OECD, 2005). Since 2005, the countries of the South, in a context of change in the international system with the entry of new actors in cooperation for development, such as China, have been reinforcing their voice in the discussion of global governance. In this sense, they have been proposing changes to improve the predictability of aid, change technical assistance and make it dependent on developing countries (and not on donors), reduce conditionality, use national systems and strengthen South-South cooperation (Schulz , 2008: 2). In fact, the construction of more balanced relations in the international system of cooperation for development takes place in a context of great imbalance of power in which the risk tends to always be assumed by the poorest countries (ODI, 2006: 2). In this way, it is important to include in the discussion of global governance, the role of citizens in donor countries (and their relations with the citizens of the South), to which donors respond directly, viewing them as elements in a chain of connection between citizens and governments of the South and the governments of the countries of the North. It is in this chain of feedback mechanisms at various levels, which makes the governance of cooperation very complex, that it seems fundamental to us to look for the concrete mechanisms that promote multilevel governance in cooperation.

 

Quotation:

Sangreman, Carlos e Tânia Santos. 2009. “Uma proposta de Observatório da Cooperação portuguesa”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho 78/2009.

Avaliando a cooperação descentralizada : pistas para um modelo com aplicação empírica

Working Paper 77/2009: Avaliando a cooperação descentralizada: pistas para um modelo com aplicação empírica


Abstract:

Since the object of Avaliando a cooperação descentralizada : pistas para um modelo com aplicação empírica is the search for clues for new forms of evaluation in Decentralized Cooperation, it will only touch the question of evaluation focused on results laterally – in the tendentially dominant definition of “results” as that which is quantifiable. In fact, empirical knowledge leads to questioning the recent orientation of “management by results”, defined by most international donors. It is a question of questioning whether this orientation does not in itself imply a devaluation of the role of evaluation, since monitoring and performance reports are designed to contain, in principle, only the elements sufficient to allow the function of controlling results, in a summative evaluation model. This document will, therefore, pay particular attention to issues related to the elements of differentiation and added value expected in the CDD, which implies that we focus primarily on topics such as the evaluation of the process, the participation of the actors, the links between the and impact, between qualitative results and sustainability, as well as issues related to innovation and experimentation. It will also look at assessment as a way of validating strategies and updating knowledge – in short, looking for clues to configure an assessment that does not focus on the control function, but rather the assessment that seeks to focus on the joint learning function. , in capacity building to improve future intervention.

 

Quotation:

Proença, Fátima. 2009. “Avaliando a cooperação descentralizada : pistas para um modelo com aplicação empírica”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA –Documentos de Trabalho nº 77/2009.

A exclusão social em Cabo Verde: uma abordagem preliminar

Working Paper 76/2009: A exclusão social em Cabo Verde: uma abordagem preliminar


Abstract:

A exclusão social em Cabo Verde: uma abordagem preliminar is an introductory study of the issue of social exclusion in Cape Verde, being an innovative topic for the country, faced a problem of lack of academic and social background reflections. In other words, on the one hand, there are few or no research works in the university world on the subject of social exclusion in less developed countries, defending the more or less consensual thesis in the scientific community, that the dominant phenomenon is poverty and not social exclusion; on the other hand, Cape Verde is a country in transition quite successfully from a lower level of development to a higher one. As a result, it finds itself in the situation of still having many problems of poverty, but it is probably already beginning to contain the germs of social exclusion in its social fabric, making a process very similar to that of European countries. This situation gives rise to a deep articulation between poverty and exclusion and makes it difficult to distinguish one from the other in the country’s development process. But it also implies an increasingly evident need to reflect on a topic that runs the risk of being (unconsciously or not) socially hidden and the object of public policies only when it has already reached dimensions that seriously affect social cohesion.

 

Quotation:

Sangreman, Carlos. 2009. “A exclusão social em Cabo Verde: uma abordagem preliminar”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 76/2009.

Modelização dos determinantes da pobreza em Cabo Verde

Working Paper 75/2008: Modelização dos determinantes da pobreza em Cabo Verde


Abstract:

The poverty profile gives information about who is poor, but it cannot be used to accurately assess the determinants of poverty. One of the advantages of the determinants of poverty is the impact of several variables on the probability of being poor while controlling for other regression variables. In Modelização dos determinantes da pobreza em Cabo Verde, regression analysis is performed taking into account the means of residence (urban and rural). The database used is from the Survey on Family Expenses and Income (IDRF) prepared by the National Statistics Institute (INE) in 2001/02. This article corresponds to a sub-chapter of the dissertation entitled “Poverty in Cape Verde: a contribution to multidimensional modelling”, presented by Fernandes, J. Moniz, (2004), as a partial requirement to obtain a Master’s degree in Statistics and Information Management, by the Instituto Superior de Estatística e Gestão de Informação of the Universidade Nova de Lisboa. On the one hand, the aim of this study is to model household poverty levels on the Cape Verde islands. On the other hand, it is hoped to contribute to identifying a set of variables that better explain the phenomenon of poverty in Cape Verde and eventually provide the social authorities (National Programme for the Fight Against Poverty – PNLP and Directorate General of Planning) with important information for decision making.

 

Quotation:

Fernandes, José Moniz Lopes. 2008. “Modelização dos determinantes da pobreza em Cabo Verde”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 75/2008.

De Macau a Ou Mun: a evolução da economia de Macau nos últimos anos da administração portuguesa e nos primeiros da administração chinesa

Working Paper 74/2008: De Macau a Ou Mun: a evolução da economia de Macau nos últimos anos da administração portuguesa e nos primeiros da administração chinesa


Abstract:

De Macau a Ou Mun: a evolução da economia de Macau nos últimos anos da administração portuguesa e nos primeiros da administração chinesa is a (much) revised and enlarged version of another one entitled “Casino Macau”, published by CEsA in 2006 as one of its Working Papers. However, substantial changes to the points of view advanced in the initial document are not expected. They are (almost) all of them already there, and we are now concerned with going deeper into documenting the ideas presented and approaching, with appropriate statistical information, the economic evolution of Macau in the last years of the Portuguese administration and in the first of the Chinese administration. What was essential in this deepening of the initial text was the possibility of approaching these issues with specialists resident in Macau through interviews carried out on site in June/2007 and a more in-depth treatment of the available statistical information. The text was written, essentially in 2007, but for various reasons it is only now possible to publish it. At the end there is a post-scriptum that gives some more current information (September/2008).

 

Quotation:

Serra, António M. de Almeida. 2008. “De Macau a Ou Mun: a evolução da economia de Macau nos últimos anos da administração portuguesa e nos primeiros da administração chinesa”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 74/2008.

Administração Pública na cooperação internacional

Working Paper 73/2007: Os ‘clusters’ e a reforma da Administração Pública na cooperação internacional portuguesa para o desenvolvimento


Abstract:

The objective of Os ‘clusters’ e a reforma da Administração Pública na cooperação internacional portuguesa para o desenvolvimento is to be a contribution to the knowledge in theory and in the practical operationalization of the new instrument of Portuguese cooperation for development – the cooperation clusters – with regard to the beneficiary countries of international aid and also in the effect that its creation and implementation can have on the reform of public and private cooperation institutions in Portugal, especially at the Institute for Development Support (IPAD) in what we call the “boomerang effect”. As for the theoretical dimension, we argue that only linking this concept to that of benchmarking, as understood in the ongoing Public Administration reform process, will make it possible to make it a real policy measure – as opposed to virtual measures announced and never operationalized – and with an innovative contribution to the reform of public institutions and non-state actors that constitute the actors in the field of Portuguese Cooperation (PC), within the current international consensus on the area and in the current Government’s Public Administration Reform policy. As for practical operationalization, we defend an implementation, perfectly feasible and not utopian, which involves a flexible operational model with which to develop cooperation programs suited to the priorities existing in each country, using the methodology of partnership and evaluation of results that are of the highest quality and as participatory as possible in all phases of identification, design, implementation and evaluation, always taking into account the political options of Portugal and the partner countries, as well as the coherence, consistency and institutional capacity of both. Experiences from other countries that finance the Cooperation were sought, as well as mentioning the cluster whose conception is more advanced in Portugal – the Island of Mozambique -, and presenting proposals for the operationalization of clusters that may constitute a standard of what Portugal can propose to countries with which have cooperation. These proposals also extend what we think can be the transformation in Portuguese institutions of the “countryside” in the light of the ideas expressed here.

 

Quotation:

Sangreman, Carlos e Fernando Carvalho. 2007. “Os ‘clusters’ e a reforma da Administração Pública na cooperação internacional portuguesa para o desenvolvimento”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 73/2007

Casino Macau: evolução da RAE Macau desde a transferência de administração

Working Paper 72/2006: ‘Casino Macau’: evolução da RAE Macau desde a transferência de administração


Abstract:

Casino Macau’: evolução da RAE Macau desde a transferência de administração is mainly intended to constitute a tour d’horizon on the main lines of evolution of Macau after the transfer of its administration to the People’s Republic of China. This, as is known, took place at zero hours of December 20, 2000, a date chosen to ensure that the transfer of administration took place after that of Hong Kong, a “point of honor” on the Portuguese side, as it ensured that Portugal , the first European country to arrive in Asia, would be the last to leave. The difficulties that the territory’s economy experienced in the last years of the Portuguese administration (see the unemployment rates and negative growth rates that occurred at the time and which were due, in part, to phenomena outside Macau such as the Asian crisis of 1997-98) could justify extending this line of “break” with the past to the economy, even within the general framework of the commitment to “one country, two systems”. Those economic difficulties would most likely be felt even without an unfavorable international economic context due to the exhaustion of what we could call the “model of great works” that had characterized the economic policy implemented by Portugal, particularly from the governments of the Comte. Almeida e Costa (1981-86), who prepared many of the projects to be implemented and who would have been the real outliner of Macau’s future as a “Chinese territory under Portuguese administration, and Carlos Melancia (1987-90), who was responsible for carrying out many of the planned works and others. It was in this context that, with the (illusory?) objective of giving Macau a relative autonomy vis-à-vis Hong Kong and even the contiguous area of ​​People’s China (Guangdong/Canton province) that it reduced its dependence on its neighbors , the construction of various infrastructures was launched (namely the airport, the port and the power station, but also bridges connecting the Macau peninsula and the island of Taipa) and agreements were negotiated with institutions outside Macau — namely international organizations such as the European Union, the GATT, etc.

 

Quotation:

Serra, António M. de Almeida. 2006. ‘Casino Macau’: evolução da RAE Macau desde a transferência de administração”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA – Documentos de Trabalho nº 72/2006.

Timor Leste: o petróleo e o futuro

Working Paper 71/2006: Timor Leste: o petróleo e o futuro


Abstract:

Timor Leste: o petróleo e o futuro has as its fundamental objective the presentation of the main information on the “petroleum economy” of East Timor, clearly assuming a more descriptive function than a critical analysis of it. For this reason, it should not be understood as a “scientific communication” to the VI EELP. It highlighted the difficulties that the country has faced in its negotiations with Australia to define its share of resources in the Timor Sea, which in its opinion should correspond to 100% since the main producing wells will be in its area. exclusive economic activity defined in accordance with the International Law of the Sea. Unfortunately, it was not possible to convince Australia of the goodness of this position and it ends up appropriating an important volume of resources that should belong to East Timor. One of the consequences of this is that Australia ends up financing part of its international aid to East Timor… with money improperly appropriated from it!… We also pointed out that the resources currently available are much greater than initially estimated due to the significant increase of oil prices on the international market. Furthermore, these resources can be greatly increased if, as is believed, the existence of oil both onshore and offshore is confirmed, but in the area where the total and complete sovereignty of Timor is unequivocally recognized. Finally, we mention that, materializing the desire to preserve most of the country’s oil wealth for future generations, the Government decided to establish a Petroleum (financial) Fund applied only abroad in order to avoid “Dutch disease” reactions in the country. national economy. The benefits for the present generations will be those that will come from the financing, by the Fund, of the General State Budget and of the expenses (namely of development) covered by it. These transfers will represent almost 2/3 of the Budget’s revenues and will amount to approximately USD 140 million in the next fiscal year (2006/07), then decreasing to approximately USD 110 million in the following three years.

 

Quotation:

Serra, António M. de Almeida. 2006. “Timor Leste: o petróleo e o futuro”. Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestão. CEsA –Documentos de Trabalho nº 71/2006.


ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management

Rua Miguel Lupi, nº20
1249-078 Lisboa
Portugal

  +351 21 392 5983 

   comunicacao@cesa.iseg.ulisboa.pt